org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.testLeakedZKNodeShouldBeDeleted(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.java:95) Actual invocations have different arguments: offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushSta

org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.testLeakedZKNodeShouldBeDeleted(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpServiceTest.java:95) Actual invocations have different arguments: offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:129) offlinePushAccessor.getOfflinePushStatusCreationTime( "test_store_v2" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.run(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:152) offlinePushAccessor.deleteOfflinePushStatusAndItsPartitionStatuses( "test_store_v1" ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService$PushStatusCleanUpTask.lambda$run$1(LeakedPushStatusCleanUpService.java:183) offlinePushAccessor.loadOfflinePushStatusPaths( ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.pushmonitor.LeakedPushSta

Process completed with exit code 1.

java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]

Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) However, there were exactly 39 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 4.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.002285d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001372d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.11361299999999999d, 1738800520484L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.070762d, 1738800520486L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001372d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001152d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.053149d, 1738800520497L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.co

java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]

Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) However, there were exactly 39 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 4.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.002285d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001372d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.11361299999999999d, 1738800520484L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.070762d, 1738800520486L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001372d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001152d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.053149d, 1738800520497L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.co

org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)

java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1000.0] but found [0.0]

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)

java.lang.AssertionError: expected [1000.0] but found [0.0]

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

Process completed with exit code 1.

Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 56 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5d48b9b506_d01db033_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5d48b9b506_d01db033_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1569760686 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1569760686 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5d48b9b506_d01db033_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800567676}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 1569760686 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5d48b9b506_d01db033_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800567676} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5d48b9b506_d01db033_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5d48b9b506_d01db033_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffse

org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted: storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621) Actual invocations have different arguments: storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.getLastOffset( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", 2 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1028/0x000000080088d440@796250a ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738800546211, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738800546211, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1028/0x000000080088d440@37d10d1b ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", 1, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738800546212, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1028/0x000000080088d440@3e31c7f7 ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738800546211, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null} ); -> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38) storageMetadataService.put( "TestTopic_584bf51113_90b73d1d_v1", 2, OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1738800546212, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerCl

org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.CannotStubVoidMethodWithReturnValue: 'put' is a *void method* and it *cannot* be stubbed with a *return value*! Voids are usually stubbed with Throwables: doThrow(exception).when(mock).someVoidMethod(); If you need to set the void method to do nothing you can use: doNothing().when(mock).someVoidMethod(); For more information, check out the javadocs for Mockito.doNothing(). *** If you're unsure why you're getting above error read on. Due to the nature of the syntax above problem might occur because: 1. The method you are trying to stub is *overloaded*. Make sure you are calling the right overloaded version. 2. Somewhere in your test you are stubbing *final methods*. Sorry, Mockito does not verify/stub final methods. 3. A spy is stubbed using when(spy.foo()).then() syntax. It is safer to stub spies - - with doReturn|Throw() family of methods. More in javadocs for Mockito.spy() method. 4. Mocking methods declared on non-public parent classes is not supported.

org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedVerificationException: Missing method call for verify(mock) here: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.AggKafkaConsumerServiceStats.recordTotalUpdateCurrentAssignmentLatency(AggKafkaConsumerServiceStats.java:68) Example of correct verification: verify(mock).doSomething() Also, this error might show up because you verify either of: final/private/equals()/hashCode() methods. Those methods *cannot* be stubbed/verified. Mocking methods declared on non-public parent classes is not supported.

Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 58 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_58cab41202_899a4d90_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_58cab41202_899a4d90_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1357698805 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1357698805 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_58cab41202_899a4d90_v1-1, attempts=5, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800548377}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 1357698805 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_58cab41202_899a4d90_v1-1, attempts=5, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800548377} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_58cab41202_899a4d90_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_58cab41202_899a4d90_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffse

java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

java.lang.AssertionError: expected object to not be null

Process completed with exit code 1.

org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000

java.lang.AssertionError: Cannot invoke "com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.StatsAvroGenericStoreClient.batchGet(com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.BatchGetRequestContext, java.util.Set)" because "this.statsAvroGenericStoreClient" is null expected [true] but found [false]

org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000

java.lang.AssertionError: Cannot invoke "com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.StatsAvroGenericStoreClient.batchGet(com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.BatchGetRequestContext, java.util.Set)" because "this.statsAvroGenericStoreClient" is null expected [true] but found [false]