Skip to content

[DVC] Add RequestBasedMetaRepository to enable metadata retrieval directly from server #4286

[DVC] Add RequestBasedMetaRepository to enable metadata retrieval directly from server

[DVC] Add RequestBasedMetaRepository to enable metadata retrieval directly from server #4286

Triggered via pull request February 6, 2025 00:06
Status Success
Total duration 13m 0s
Artifacts 19
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
11s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

22 errors
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [1]
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 52 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1740138227 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1740138227 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800652601}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 1740138227 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800652601} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, late
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [1]
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 52 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1740138227 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1740138227 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800652601}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 1740138227 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800652601} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2199) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_5193d8575b_f83bb3e6_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, late
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) However, there were exactly 36 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 8.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.004358d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001794d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.002134d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.7151080000000001d, 1738800673363L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.08797500000000001d, 1738800673368L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.002144d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.058339d, 1738800673380L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinc
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) However, there were exactly 36 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 8.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.004358d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.001794d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.002134d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.7151080000000001d, 1738800673363L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.08797500000000001d, 1738800673368L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2621) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1995) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.002144d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:756) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1635) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.058339d, 1738800673380L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1302) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1307) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinc
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 58 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.close(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testProcessConsumerActionsError$158(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:5328) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.close(StoreIngestionTask.java:4133) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1243499834 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1243499834 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1, attempts=5, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800706209}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 1243499834 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1, attempts=5, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800706209} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1243499834 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testProcessConsumerActionsError$158(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:5338) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2629)
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError: clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError( <any string>, 1, <Capturing argument> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4353) However, there were exactly 58 interactions with this mock: leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:887) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition( TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1, true ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:644) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:658) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:605) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:667) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.close(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testProcessConsumerActionsError$158(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:5328) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.close(StoreIngestionTask.java:4133) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run(); -> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1657) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4186) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1243499834 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1659) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1575) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1243499834 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1660) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1, attempts=5, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800706209}, Mock for Store, hashCode: 1243499834 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1949) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction( KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1, attempts=5, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1738800706209} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:572) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions( Mock for Store, hashCode: 1243499834 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testProcessConsumerActionsError$158(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:5338) leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset( PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_6379b043d5_546c56af_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGetToUnreachableClient: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1021
java.lang.AssertionError: Cannot invoke "com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.StatsAvroGenericStoreClient.batchGet(com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.BatchGetRequestContext, java.util.Set)" because "this.statsAvroGenericStoreClient" is null expected [true] but found [false]
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGetToUnreachableClient: clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1021
java.lang.AssertionError: Cannot invoke "com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.StatsAvroGenericStoreClient.batchGet(com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.BatchGetRequestContext, java.util.Set)" because "this.statsAvroGenericStoreClient" is null expected [true] but found [false]

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
StaticAnalysis
666 KB
clients-jdk11
2.61 MB
clients-jdk17
2.64 MB
clients-jdk8
2.57 MB
controller-jdk11
1.66 MB
controller-jdk17
1.62 MB
controller-jdk8
1.62 MB
integrations-jdk11
561 KB
integrations-jdk17
566 KB
integrations-jdk8
549 KB
internal-jdk11
3.51 MB
internal-jdk17
3.52 MB
internal-jdk8
3.5 MB
router-jdk11
1.04 MB
router-jdk17
1.03 MB
router-jdk8
1.03 MB
server-jdk11
9.54 MB
server-jdk17
9.24 MB
server-jdk8
9.43 MB