Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
z80dma.cpp: add derivateves ZILOG, UA858D, SPEC_NEXT #12658
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
z80dma.cpp: add derivateves ZILOG, UA858D, SPEC_NEXT #12658
Changes from 1 commit
c220561
7d25f7b
f915e9f
2315fc9
dabf077
05d0e74
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still not quite convinced that the base
z80dma_device
has to know it has children here, perhaps moving this logic toua858d_device
and makespecnext_dma_device
a subclass of that should be the play here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did this on purpose for Next case. It needs to switch type preserving existing state of registers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, in the context of if somebody else went their own route in subclassing the arch.
Notice that even a
// NOTE:
or a// FIXME:
is okay for me.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. Let's assume we keep specnextdma how it was before this commit.
Regarding spectrum which select chip based on mashine config... do I need to add slot for dma now? Or are the other way to do this?