Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DO NOT MERGE: add notebook demonstrating proteomic aggregation and example analysis #120

Open
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

samobermiller
Copy link
Collaborator

@samobermiller samobermiller commented Jan 31, 2025

#95

New Notebook Submissions:

  • Have you included a summary of the notebook in the README.md included updated links to the notebook?
  • Does your PR include links to the new notebook (in the branch) for review using nbviewer, Colab, and reviewnb? These three are the preferred ways to review changes and additions to notebooks during review.
  • Does your PR include a test in a github workflow that tests the render-ability of your notebook?

python:

https://colab.research.google.com/github/microbiomedata/nmdc_notebooks/blob/95-create-notebook-that-aggregates-proteomic-workflow-outputs-and-visualizes-the-results/proteomic_aggregation/python/proteomic_aggregation.ipynb

https://nbviewer.org/github/microbiomedata/nmdc_notebooks/blob/95-create-notebook-that-aggregates-proteomic-workflow-outputs-and-visualizes-the-results/proteomic_aggregation/python/proteomic_aggregation.ipynb

…n, also added scipy and jupyter to requirements.txt (not sure if jupyter necessary or assumed as preexisting but had to recreate my venv so added it). changed pandas version to 2.1.2 because 2.1.1 was generating: 'ValueError: numpy.dtype size changed, may indicate binary incompatibility', when pandas was being imported in ipynb (checked and appears there was bug fix in 2.1.2)
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@samobermiller samobermiller requested a review from bmeluch January 31, 2025 21:00
@samobermiller samobermiller requested a review from kheal February 3, 2025 18:52
…ns.py. could not figure out way to import across different subfolders right now. also added table length limit of 6 for pandas df printouts and changed almost all cells to single output
@kheal
Copy link
Collaborator

kheal commented Feb 4, 2025

@samobermiller - some of my comments might be out of date, feel free to resolve them. I didn't realize I didn't "submit" them last night doh!

…scussion with lee ann. will still need to change in folder readme. this version includes t test and pvalues, may remove depending on further discussion
@samobermiller
Copy link
Collaborator Author

may remove current t test and pvalue analysis and replace with missingness figure

@samobermiller samobermiller requested a review from bmeluch February 6, 2025 01:34
@bmeluch bmeluch requested a review from lamccue February 10, 2025 17:26
…t to proteomic_aggregation since there is no longer analysis per say
…-workflow-outputs-and-visualizes-the-results

other notebooks were updated to pass checks. previously failing because new data was added that didnt accommodate hardcoding
@samobermiller samobermiller marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2025 22:42
@bmeluch
Copy link
Contributor

bmeluch commented Feb 20, 2025

I didn't add a comment for every single one but I would double check that all the markdown cells have periods at the end of their last sentences.

Colab runs and nbviewer looks good to me :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create notebook that aggregates proteomic workflow outputs and visualizes the results
4 participants