-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix the verbiage for adding new repository #293
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ Adopt organizational practices documented in this repo, work in the open, and co | |
|
||
There are currently two ways new repositories may appear in the opensearch-project organization: creating a new repo and adopting, or moving a repo from outside of the organization into it. The process is the same. | ||
|
||
The AWS Open Source Program Office (OSPO) currently owns and manages the opensearch-project organization, and has permissions to create a new repo. This will change shortly following the [formation of the OpenSearch Software Foundation](https://foundation.opensearch.org/). While the admins above have admin-level permissions, they do not have permissions to create new repositories or move repositories into the organization. | ||
[The OpenSearch Software Foundation](https://foundation.opensearch.org) currently owns and manages the opensearch-project organization, and has permissions to create a new repo. While the admins above have admin-level permissions, they do not have permissions to create new repositories or move repositories into the organization. | ||
|
||
All new repositories inside opensearch-project follow the [security response process](SECURITY.md), and therefore require an Amazon team to be engaged when necessary. If you wish to create a repository in this organization, or move a repository into opensearch-project, please contact one of the above-mentioned admins via the [#maintainers channel on the public Slack](https://opensearch.slack.com/archives/C05L60S4UBT). | ||
All new repositories inside opensearch-project follow the [security response process](SECURITY.md), and therefore expect the repository maintainers to be engaged when necessary. If you wish to create a repository in this organization, or move a repository into opensearch-project, please contact one of the above-mentioned admins via the [#maintainers channel on the public Slack](https://opensearch.slack.com/archives/C05L60S4UBT). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the right process is to open a ticket in .github. The admins are not in the #maintainers channel either. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. make sense, will modify here. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @dblock modified per your recommendation. |
||
|
||
While the opensearch-project organization has adopted [opensearch-plugin-template-java](https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-plugin-template-java), or [opensearch-project/opensearch-learning-to-rank-base](https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-learning-to-rank-base) in the past, we generally encourage you to start and run with your open-source project outside of the organization, and only consider making it part of it when you wish to include your already very popular component or tool in the "official" distribution. To request moving a repo into this organization, please open a proposal in your repo, have repo maintainers confirm they wish to move, and engage admins via the [#admin-requests channel on the public Slack](https://opensearch.slack.com/archives/C051CKVFB2A). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this true? I believe the admins actually do have permissions now to do this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dblock how to confirm this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@getsaurabh02 should be able to