-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Rule23-1.md #1434
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update Rule23-1.md #1434
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -36,15 +36,15 @@ | |
- get the hvac system from the hvac_system_id: `hvac_system = get_component_by_id(hvac_system_id)` | ||
- get the heating system: `heating_system = hvac_system.heating_system` | ||
- get the heatpump_low_shutoff_temperature = `heatpump_low_shutoff = heating_system.heatpump_low_shutoff_temperature` | ||
- get the auxiliary heat high temperature shutoff = 'aux_heat_high_temp_shutoff = heating_system.heatpump_auxilliary_heat_high_shutoff_temperature` | ||
- get the auxiliary heat energy source: `aux_heat_energy_source = heatpump_auxilliary_heat_type` | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this needs to be modified to |
||
|
||
**Rule Assertion:** | ||
- Case 1: The system type is 2 and the heatpump_low_shutoff is <= 17F, PASS: `if system_type == HVAC_SYS.2: if heatpump_low_shutoff <= 17: PASS` | ||
- Case 2: The system type is 2 and the heatpump_low_shutoff is >25F, FAIL, provide a message: `elif system_type == HVAC_SYS.2:` | ||
- `if heatpump_low_shutoff > 25: FAIL; note = "Fail because low temperature heat pump shutoff is above 25F for system 2. The modeled low temperature heat pump shutoff value is " + heatpump_low_shutoff | ||
+ "."` | ||
- Case 3: the system type is 2 and the heatpump_low_shutoff is between 17F and 25: UNDETERMINED; provide a message: `else: UNDETERMINED; note = "Undetermined because the low temperature shutoff is between 17F and 25F for System Type 2. Check with the rating authority to ensure correct shutoff temperature. Low shutoff temperature is currently modeled at: " heatpump_low_shutoff = "."` | ||
- Case 4: the system type is 4 (we already know it's 4, because we've checked the 3 SYS 2 cases above), and the low shutoff temperature is <=10F: PASS: `if heatpump_low_shutoff <= 10F: PASS` | ||
- Case 5: anything else, FAIL: `ELSE: Fail` | ||
- Case 1: The auxiliary heat high temperature shutoff is greater than 40F, or the auxiliary heat energy source is anything other than electricity - FAIL: `if (aux_heat_high_temp_shutoff > 40) or (aux_heat_energy_source != "ELECTRIC_RESISTANCE"): FAIL` | ||
- Case 2: The system type is 2 and the heatpump_low_shutoff is <= 17F OR tye system type is 4 and the heatpump_low_shutoff is <=10F, PASS: `if(system_type == HVAC_SYS.2 and heatpump_low_shutoff <= 17) or (system_type == HVAC_SYS.4 and heatpump_low_shutoff <= 10): PASS` | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There is no Appendix G basis for this, correct? Based on recent discussions within the commitee, I am not sure we should be making these assumptions; I know we decided on this approach previously but wonder if it is still appropriate. It does seem like a no brainer to use 17F but not sure about the 10F since there were comments about us "interpreting" 90.1 requirements which this kind of falls into. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think that these minimum numbers come from the minimum temperature at which the heat pumps are rated based on the AHRI conditions from Table 6.8.1-2 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ... but open to discussion. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think 10F is in those tables. 17F is though. |
||
- Case 3: The system type is 2 and the heatpump_low_shutoff is >25F, FAIL, provide a message: `elif system_type == HVAC_SYS.2 && heatpump_low_shutoff > 25:` | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Use of Ruby instead of python with the &&? |
||
- `FAIL; note = "Fail because low temperature heat pump shutoff is above 25F for system 2. The modeled low temperature heat pump shutoff value is " + heatpump_low_shutoff + "."` | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same question of the 25F heat pump low shut off for System 2. Is this an interpretation from our side or is there a requirement that states this that I'm missing? |
||
- Case 4: the system type is 2 and the heatpump_low_shutoff is between 17F and 25: UNDETERMINED; provide a message: `else: UNDETERMINED; note = "Undetermined because the low temperature shutoff is between 17F and 25F for System Type 2. Check with the rating authority to ensure correct shutoff temperature. Low shutoff temperature is currently modeled at: " heatpump_low_shutoff = "."` | ||
|
||
**Notes:** | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the last character needs to be corrected. Looks like a character is off making it so the python is not blue