Skip to content

[PULP-399] Include data table for perf/scale blog post (2023-02) #114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

[PULP-399] Include data table for perf/scale blog post (2023-02) #114

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion .../sections/blog/posts/2023/2023-02-14-rpm-redirect-serving-perf-scale-testing.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,10 +68,12 @@ Now that we've seen the results, let's go through the system that produced them.
### Physical hardware All on AWS in EU-West-2

1 Load generator - m4.2xlarge instance:

* 8 64-bit CPUs, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz
* 32GB Ram

1 Pulp test machine - m4.2xlarge instance:

* 8 64-bit CPUs, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz
* 32GB Ram

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -184,7 +186,7 @@ increases in req/sec with additional increases in locust users.

## Data Collected

See [this spreadsheet](../../../../files/pulp_rpm_redirection_perf_and_scale_blog_post/Sheet1.html)
See [this spreadsheet](resources/sheet.html)
for the raw data collected.

A few comments on the data:
Expand Down
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions docs/sections/blog/posts/2023/resources/sheet.html
View file
Open in desktop
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is not nicely formatted.
Also why can't we serve the sheet.css next to the html?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've basically copied the original. Do you think I should run a formatter on it?

Also why can't we serve the sheet.css next to the html?

We can, but I believe we'd have to include it via the mkdocs extra css config, which doesn't seems right.
I mean, an html will be served directly, but not a css.

Large diffs are not rendered by default.