Skip to content

[#922] controlling resources deletion #2214

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

aawoznia26
Copy link

DeletionPolicy was added to Federation, Queue, Shovel, and Vhost resources. It controls whether resource in RabbitMQ cluster is removed when custom resource is deleted.
The deletionPolicy can be set to:

  • delete: The resource will be removed from RabbitMQ cluster when the custom resource deleted (default)
  • retain: The resource will remain in RabbitMQ cluster when the custom resource deleted

Corresponding PR in Messaging Topology Operator repo
Change is result of the issue 922

@michaelklishin
Copy link
Contributor

Merged manually with some edits. Thank you, @aawoznia26.

@aawoznia26
Copy link
Author

aawoznia26 commented Mar 19, 2025

Hi @michaelklishin,
I've linked to that PR corresponding PR in Messaging Topology Operator repo. It wasn't reviewed yet.
Is it acceptable to merge change in website before feature review? If not, sorry for causing confusion.

@michaelklishin
Copy link
Contributor

No, in that case I will revert the change. No worries, thank you for pointing that out.

@aawoznia26
Copy link
Author

Will create new one, when feature will be reviewed and merged

michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
This reverts commit dd17b82.
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
This reverts commit f491f20.
aawoznia26 pushed a commit to aawoznia26/rabbitmq-website that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
This reverts commit a1e6eb8.
aawoznia26 pushed a commit to aawoznia26/rabbitmq-website that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants