-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
Adding impl/test crumbs for requirements #1507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 6 commits
039d962
d7702a4
d3aa64f
067b61d
521fb7e
e3019ea
d267609
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -291,6 +291,10 @@ def insertDepletableNuclideKeys(c, blueprint): | |
""" | ||
Auto update number density keys on all DEPLETABLE components. | ||
|
||
.. impl:: Any depletable component will be adjusted. | ||
:id: I_ARMI_BP_NUC_FLAGS | ||
:implements: R_ARMI_BP_NUC_FLAGS | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think this is in the most appropriate place? I would assume this would be better put into somewhere in There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hm, or maybe this is just one part of it. I guess the user needs to define composite objects with the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is just a "blueprint requirement", so I put it in the most general place in the blueprints. That's really as far as my thought process went. Hmmm There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Okay, well it is good where it is, by the logic of my second comment above. But during the upcoming "real" review, I anticipate we'll probably ask for another impl in the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Updated. Take a look. |
||
Notes | ||
----- | ||
This should be moved to a neutronics/depletion plugin hook but requires some | ||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.